<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life After God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/life-after-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/life-after-god/</link>
	<description>WWW.RATIONALAPOLOGETICS.COM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:40:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Morgan-LynnGriggs Lamberth[skeptic griggsy]</title>
		<link>http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/life-after-god/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan-LynnGriggs Lamberth[skeptic griggsy]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Michael  Peterson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael  Peterson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan-LynnGriggs Lamberth[skeptic griggsy]</title>
		<link>http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/life-after-god/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan-LynnGriggs Lamberth[skeptic griggsy]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Yes! There is so much evil to count against any god but enough good for us to appreciate life. Some think we cannot so aver,as Michale Peterson notes in &quot;God and Evil, since then if all the evil hadn&#039;t happen we would not be here. That is a paradox. Evil counts against any god ,but that is independent of our valuing life.
  Theists have a cop-out in that they claim that if God doesn&#039;t responds with yes to prayers, then He has a reason for that.But they don&#039;t know that and that seems to be an argument from ignorance to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! There is so much evil to count against any god but enough good for us to appreciate life. Some think we cannot so aver,as Michale Peterson notes in &#8220;God and Evil, since then if all the evil hadn&#8217;t happen we would not be here. That is a paradox. Evil counts against any god ,but that is independent of our valuing life.<br />
  Theists have a cop-out in that they claim that if God doesn&#8217;t responds with yes to prayers, then He has a reason for that.But they don&#8217;t know that and that seems to be an argument from ignorance to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat Wilder</title>
		<link>http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/life-after-god/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Wilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I wish more people could realize the truth of this. I like to put it this way: is the beauty of a flower in any way diminished by its wilting? Additionally, if there were an afterlife, what would the point of this life be? A supposedly perfect, blissful existence after this one, makes this one - beautiful though it is - pale and empty, because there is much suffering mixed with the beauty.

I am reminded by your post of one of my favorite Camus quotes: &quot;If there is a sin against life, it consists perhaps not so much in despairing of life as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this life.&quot;
-Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish more people could realize the truth of this. I like to put it this way: is the beauty of a flower in any way diminished by its wilting? Additionally, if there were an afterlife, what would the point of this life be? A supposedly perfect, blissful existence after this one, makes this one &#8211; beautiful though it is &#8211; pale and empty, because there is much suffering mixed with the beauty.</p>
<p>I am reminded by your post of one of my favorite Camus quotes: &#8220;If there is a sin against life, it consists perhaps not so much in despairing of life as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this life.&#8221;<br />
-Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Thomas</title>
		<link>http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/life-after-god/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Agreed -- the shorter isn&#039;t the better. I certainly didn&#039;t mean that. My point was that the end of life emphasizes the life -- if it weren&#039;t for the knowledge of death, many would live differently. Death, while the absence of beauty itself, ironically impacts our lives to make them more beautiful. I agree, though, that this could very well be relative to the person doing the living. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed &#8212; the shorter isn&#8217;t the better. I certainly didn&#8217;t mean that. My point was that the end of life emphasizes the life &#8212; if it weren&#8217;t for the knowledge of death, many would live differently. Death, while the absence of beauty itself, ironically impacts our lives to make them more beautiful. I agree, though, that this could very well be relative to the person doing the living. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panvega</title>
		<link>http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/life-after-god/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>panvega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rationalapologetics.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I agree that we don&#039;t need God for life to be worth living. It seems incredibly sad to me that people need God to explain the beautiful things in the world. 

That said, I don&#039;t think being short is what makes life precious. It seems that would imply that shorter lives are inherently more meaningful, and that the longer a person lives, or a relationship, etc., is, the less meaning it has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we don&#8217;t need God for life to be worth living. It seems incredibly sad to me that people need God to explain the beautiful things in the world. </p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t think being short is what makes life precious. It seems that would imply that shorter lives are inherently more meaningful, and that the longer a person lives, or a relationship, etc., is, the less meaning it has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
